英国皇家检控署检控官因AI搜索在高等法院引用虚构判例
Start here
英国皇家检控署（CPS）一名高级检控官在高等法院审理一起争议起诉儿童的案件时，因使用网络搜索返回的 AI 摘要，引用了一起完全虚构的判例法，并提交了不存在的判例编号。涉事检控官事后承认属于引用失误。对此，CPS 表示已就此展开内部审查，并重申检控人员必须从可信信源引用先例。该事件使得英国追踪统计的法庭 AI 差错与虚假引用记录累计达到 101 起。
AI-generated from reports · Updated 16 hours ago
Report timeline
Follow the reports to see different sides of the story.
- Hacker News · AISelectedCPS Prosecutor Cites Fictitious Legal Precedent in High Court Following AI Search
A senior prosecutor from the UK's Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) cited entirely fabricated case law during a High Court hearing after relying on an AI-generated web search summary. In a disputed case involving the prosecution of a child, the prosecutor submitted a non-existent case citation and later admitted it was a citation error. The CPS stated that it has launched an internal review and reiterated that legal precedents must be cited strictly from trusted sources. The incident brings the total number of tracked court-related AI errors and bogus citations in the UK to 101.
Story heat trend
Current heat 6·Comparable peak 10（Nov 3 21:00）·Comparable change, last 24 hours–
Trends compare only the same parties observed continuously, so the scope can be narrower than current heat counts. Move the pointer or tap the chart to see hourly heat; use the left and right arrow keys on a keyboard.